Comments for Wealth Managment

Comment on Why do people get mad at our servicemen? by lonelywolf5417

lonelywolf5417 — Mon, 06 Feb 2012 10:05:59 +0000

because many US service men shoplift at super markets in host countries LOL
References :

Comment on Why do people get mad at our servicemen? by Sophie

Sophie — Mon, 06 Feb 2012 09:22:59 +0000

It's time for grown men with guns who do the dirty work for a military cabal that murders millions around the world for control to start taking responsibility for their own actions. They are not drafted, they're volunteers. This nonsense about not having any political opinion about the issues so they can just go kill without having to take responsibility has grown old and tired. It's disgusting.
References :

Comment on Why do people get mad at our servicemen? by Dances with Labradors

Dances with Labradors — Mon, 06 Feb 2012 08:42:59 +0000

Mad at our servicemen? I only hear admiration for them, from all across the political spectrum. This is the one thing that almost all Americans, left, right, and center, agree on.
References :

Comment on Why do people get mad at our servicemen? by ToxicP125

ToxicP125 — Mon, 06 Feb 2012 08:16:59 +0000

Do the Jews have a right to be mad at German soldiers? After all, they were just following orders.

From a moral & ethical point of view, simply following orders doesn’t make you right or free of responsibility. In my view, never join the military if you don’t believe in neoconservatism. EVERYONE today knows exactly what our politicians will have the military do…interventionism is the name of the game (has been since WWII).

So if someone is against "interventionism", than why shouldn’t they have a right to be bad at our servicemen? They joined knowing full well what they are about to likely be called to do.
References :

Comment on Why do people get mad at our servicemen? by Voonie Vootie

Voonie Vootie — Mon, 06 Feb 2012 07:58:59 +0000

Went to see the new Mission Impossible movie with my son who is home on leave from the Navy. The tickets were $34 for four of us but with his Navy ID it was only $20 (Showcase Cinemas). Nobody was mad at him. When he flew home on US Airways they bumped him up to first class and he got free drinks.
References :

Comment on Why do people get mad at our servicemen? by DrZ

DrZ — Mon, 06 Feb 2012 07:39:59 +0000

IF they do…it is because the serviceman is accessible whereas the politicians are not.

I don’t seem to know of this happening since Vietnam.

Semper Fidelis,
Z
References :

Comment on Why are Republicans so hostile towards the workers? by Really tired of stupid people.

Really tired of stupid people. — Fri, 27 Jan 2012 22:50:59 +0000

Let us start with taxes as this is clearly something no one understands. We do not want to raise taxes on anyone. The wealthy in this country those making the highest earned income are taxed at 35%. Now when ANYONE takes the money they have and invests it and then turns a profit they are taxed at 15% this is called capital gains tax and is a tax on prophets made from money that had ALREADY ben taxed.

Union employees are the reason things cost so much on this country, the auto workers union is why a car costs 50k of you but american and the lack thereof is why a honda costs so much less..the japanese are doing fine without unions they are booming.

We want everyone to be responsible for his it her item success and failure social security ribs you of that. It takes money out of the system and puts it in. public coffers so washington can spend it how they see fit.

If their were no unions demanding things that they had not earned their would be no outsourcing.pain and simple.

The health and safety regs id just a flat out lie. No one had suggested removing osha or anything like that, it is simple a taking point of the left with no basis in reality.
the last had done more to keep the workers down than anyone in history. With projects and minimum wage and welfare they have robbed people of the pride in a days work.
References :

Comment on Why are Republicans so hostile towards the workers? by RAM

RAM — Fri, 27 Jan 2012 22:00:59 +0000

Of course you’re correct, but I’m surprised that you haven’t mentioned their plan for a New World Order. Many consider this not just a threat to ‘workers’, who are as ’successful’ as anyone else, IMO, but to the very way of life of every human on the Earth, because it would only serve to abolish all cultural differences; eliminate all borders; immobilize any threat by anyone to the NWO by consolidating all military power within the control of the NWO; consolidate all financial activity to that allowed by the NWO; squelch any competition to any NWO enterprise, either financial, technological or industrial; abolish all income-livelihood, safety-net programs, free health care systems, and every other similar ’social security’ programs because by this point, the population of the earth not part of the elite workers, staff and military of the NWO will be on their own to provide for their needs (restricted, of course, from migrating into areas controlled by the NWO); and finally, if it comes down to the ‘acceptable losses’ from nuclear strikes aimed at those areas of the population of the Earth not important to future development plans of the NWO, then so it be. Virtually all of the things you’ve mentioned are directly or indirectly related to this plan for a NWO (which Bush senior mentioned in his ‘State of the Union’ address way back when).
The US and Great Britain are leading the way in following through with the development and implementation of this planned NWO, with the Republican party, and more of the Democratic party each year, joining the ranks of the affluent few who see it coming, and are willing to embrace it as the manipulation of the laws by them continues to give them more power; they are following this plan regardless of the possible limit of their eventual involvement because it will ultimately only benefit roughly 1% of the world’s population while everyone else will either be ‘members’ in subservient positions to the elite directly or as representatives of the NWO in general, or they’ll be vanquished, as I mentioned, to areas not directly under the NWO’s care, control, or concern, but most likely monitored in some way as to keep them from developing any technology or planning any type of insurrection.
The plan is so simple that it seems as though it couldn’t possibly bypass the watchful, thoughtful awareness of virtually anyone at present in any position to make a stand, but most of the world’s population is conveniently distracted by the false calamity of financial gloom and doom by the Stock Market (run and primarily serving the NWO-related minority who are really in no danger whatsoever of losing their control of the situation) and fears of terrorism by the US and Great Britain (ironically, I think not), who are so obviously attempting to usurp as much of the major areas of the world as possible with valuable resources before it is so obvious and reprehensible that the smaller governments rise to the occasion in protest, but by then I’m afraid it will be too late. The major players in their respective dictatorial and otherwise self-centered positions in the smaller countries of less military consequence and holding no valuable resources that can’t be taken away from them later, are either ‘playing ball’ in order to at least think they’re a part of the big picture, or as I said, too self-centered, squabbling about the minor issues peculiar to their respective countries, and rightly could give a damn until it becomes more obvious that there is a viable threat to their leadership, but by then, as I said, it will be too late.
References :
I would say something like, "God help us all" if I thought that it would matter, at all.

Comment on Why are Republicans so hostile towards the workers? by kpk02

kpk02 — Fri, 27 Jan 2012 21:24:59 +0000

Who’s talking about making unions illegal? All I’ve seen are efforts to ensure that workers have the right to choose whether they want to be in a union or not and also make sure that their vote remains private and uninfluenced. If anything, those things strongly support workers’ rights.

Unless you’re talking about public unions, but public unions should not exist since all it ends up being is the government sitting on both sides of the bargaining table which is hardly fair to the taxpayers who foot the bill for those employees.

Minimum wage doesn’t end up helping anyone. In fact it’s more likely to hurt people looking for part time summer jobs or side jobs for some extra change. When you have a minimum wage, you risk placing a higher price on some jobs than the work is worth.. meaning those jobs will simply disappear entirely. Not every job should earn enough to support a lifestyle. Sometimes it’s just for some extra pocket money. Keep in mind that only a very tiny portion of people only earn the minimum wage. The majority of people who start out there end up getting pay increases within a couple of months.

Social security is on track to eliminate itself as it stands right now, so any proposals to eliminate it shouldn’t be overlooked. I’d rather eliminate it and keep the money myself than to keep paying into a program that may go bankrupt by the time I am at retirement age. I don’t see how forcing people to pay into a dying system is promoting workers’ rights.

The workers pay no where near 30% in taxes, so cut the crap on that one. And the 15% reduced rate only applies to long term capital investments. Any other investments or income is taxed at the normal bracket rates. Look at the tax revenue information… the rich on average pay 20-25% of their income in taxes whereas the middle class ranges from 10-16% and the poor tops out at around 2-3% with most paying negative tax rates. You’re looking at specific rich individuals and not at the group as a whole.

And I’ve seen no one promoting outsourcing or eliminating safety and health regulations.
References :

Comment on Why are Republicans so hostile towards the workers? by McNamara

McNamara — Fri, 27 Jan 2012 21:18:59 +0000

Republicans are hostile toward union largess, not workers. Unions artificially raise labor costs, thereby decreasing job availability. They are the ones doing the damage to workers. Even the people working in unions are victimized by the union bosses. Most unionized workers have no say in how their dues are spent or even whether to unionize in the first place.
References :